How Arm Holdings plc stacks up

ARM · against 1,707 other Technology companies

Overall

64/ 100

Near the top of its peers.

Ranked #393 of 1,708 · scores higher than 75% of peers

Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the overall score

297 peers with an overall score of 60–69, including ARM · Click a bar to see the companies

The four scores behind it

Overall = average of valuation, growth, profitability and safety percentile (categories without data are skipped)

Valuation#1,326 of 1,667Score 20 / 100 · beats 20%Growth#260 of 1,669Score 84 / 100 · beats 84%Profitability#386 of 1,708Score 77 / 100 · beats 77%Risk#419 of 1,698Lower relative risk · safety 75 · beats 75%

Ranking by overall score

Top 5 and the companies ranked around ARM

Rank	Company	Market cap	Overall	Valuation	Growth	Profitability	Risk
1	LEENO Industrial Inc.058470.KQ · South Korea	4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B)	97		97	94	0 / 2
2	Transcend Information, Inc.2451.TW · Taiwan	117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B)	94	98	95	99	0 / 2
3	Joint Stock Company Kaspi.kzKSPI · US-listed	17.5B USD	93	93	91	92	0 / 2
3	Yuanbao Inc.YB · US-listed	500M USD	93		97	98	0 / 2
5	Systena Corporation2317.T · Japan	146.9B JPY (≈$999M)	92	94	95	97	0 / 2
⋯
393	Yangtze Optical Fibre And Cable Joint Stock Limited Company6869.HK · Hong Kong	143.1B HKD (≈$18.3B)	64	60	55	91	1 / 2
393	Amlogic (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd.688099.SS · China	36.8B CNY (≈$5.2B)	64	43	56	73	0 / 2
393	SCREEN Holdings Co., Ltd.7735.T · Japan	1.74T JPY (≈$11.9B)	64	75	50	83	1 / 2
393	ACM Research, Inc.ACMR · US-listed	3.2B USD	64	58	85	62	1 / 2
393	Arm Holdings plcARM · US-listed	216.3B USD	64	20	84	77	0 / 2
393	Badger Meter, Inc.BMI · US-listed	4.4B USD	64	52	43	85	0 / 2
393	Bitdeer Technologies GroupBTDR · US-listed	1.9B USD	64	77	97	72	2 / 2
393	Calix, Inc.CALX · US-listed	2.1B USD	64	51	86	54	1 / 2
393	Climb Global Solutions, Inc.CLMB · US-listed	791M USD	64	57	79	72	1 / 2

Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score

Bringing the fundamentals into focus…