Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ARLP · against 127 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #31 of 128 · scores higher than 76% of peers · safety percentile 78
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)11 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including ARLP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, debt / equity and beta, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ARLP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 127 reported | 0.33× | 0.52× | 71% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 127 reported | 0.30 | 0.51 | 68% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 128 reported | 1.75× | 1.50× | 63% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 2 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 99 | ||
| 3 | 4.4B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 4 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 5 | 14.8B ILS (≈$4.0B) | 97 | 63 | |
| 27 | 2.2B USD | 84 | 89 | |
| 28 | 42.6B CNY (≈$6.0B) | 83 | 63 | |
| 29 | 19.2B MYR (≈$4.2B) | 83 | 72 | |
| 30 | 5.7B CAD (≈$4.1B) | 78 | 51 | |
| 31 | 3.4B USD | 78 | 62 | |
| 32 | 2.1B USD | 77 | 65 | |
| 33 | 3.3B AUD (≈$2.2B) | 77 | 34 | |
| 34 | 5.1B CAD (≈$3.7B) | 76 | 73 | |
| 35 | 3.7B USD | 75 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score