Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Arhaus, Inc.
How Arhaus, Inc. stacks up
ARHS · against 452 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
31/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #337 of 453 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score43 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including ARHS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 31?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 73% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 2.4% vs peer median 6.1%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 69% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.7% vs peer median 8.8%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.0% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ARHS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ARHS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 450 reported | 4.1% | 5.6% | 39% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 462 reported | 5.7% | 9.7% | 25% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 147 reported | 2.4% | 6.8% | 21% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 452 reported | 24.3% | 56.1% | 19% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ARHS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 151.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 6.9B HKD (≈$885M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 332 | 26.5B SEK (≈$2.6B) | 32 | 24 | |
| 332 | 3.0B AUD (≈$2.0B) | 32 | 43 | |
| 337 | 16.3B CNY (≈$2.3B) | 31 | 63 | |
| 337 | 30.9B TWD (≈$957M) | 31 | 38 | |
| 337 | 1.7B USD | 31 | 44 | |
| 337 | 1.5B USD | 31 | 22 | |
| 337 | 47.0B MXN (≈$2.5B) | 31 | 27 | |
| 342 | 178.5B JPY (≈$1.2B) | 30 | 57 | |
| 342 | 11.0B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 30 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score