Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ARHS · against 459 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #421 of 460 · scores higher than 8% of peers · safety percentile 11
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)51 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including ARHS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ARHS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 454 reported | 1.47× | 0.48× | 16% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 447 reported | 2.31 | 0.56 | 0% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 446 reported | 1.33× | 1.49× | 42% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2.6B CAD (≈$1.9B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 6.7B HKD (≈$861M) | 98 | 72 | |
| 4 | 6.3B CNY (≈$882M) | 98 | 60 | |
| 5 | 14.5B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 417 | 2.9B USD | 12 | 28 | |
| 418 | 2.0B USD | 12 | 27 | |
| 419 | 2.6B EUR (≈$2.9B) | 12 | 50 | |
| 420 | 26.5B SEK (≈$2.6B) | 12 | 24 | |
| 421 | 1.7B USD | 11 | 44 | |
| 422 | 8.6B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 11 | 38 | |
| 423 | 876M USD | 11 | 44 | |
| 424 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 11 | 34 | |
| 425 | 1.4B USD | 11 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score