Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Arhaus, Inc.
How Arhaus, Inc. stacks up
ARHS · against 465 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
86/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #49 of 466 · scores higher than 88% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score55 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including ARHS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 86?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital and return on assets, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 6.6% vs peer median 6.4%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 67% of peers. Return on assets: 4.8% vs peer median 3.3%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 94% of peers. Return on invested capital: 39.0% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ARHS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ARHS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 440 reported | 39.0% | 8.6% | 96% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 465 reported | 6.6% | 7.5% | 43% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 443 reported | 4.8% | 3.9% | 62% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 432 reported | 17.3% | 9.9% | 81% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 468 reported | 38.0% | 31.1% | 63% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ARHS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 106.7B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 1 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 4 | 404.0B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 90 | |
| 4 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 49 | |
| 49 | 14.5B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 86 | 76 | |
| 49 | 6.2B CNY (≈$864M) | 86 | 83 | |
| 49 | 415.1B JPY (≈$2.8B) | 86 | 69 | |
| 49 | 6.7B BRL (≈$1.2B) | 86 | 80 | |
| 49 | 1.7B USD | 86 | 44 | |
| 49 | 1.4B AUD (≈$896M) | 86 | 51 | |
| 57 | 25.0B HKD (≈$3.2B) | 85 | 60 | |
| 57 | 6.8B CNY (≈$959M) | 85 | 77 | |
| 57 | 1.7B SGD (≈$1.3B) | 85 | 83 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score