Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Arhaus, Inc.
How Arhaus, Inc. stacks up
ARHS · against 462 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #270 of 463 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score48 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including ARHS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -3.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.9% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.4% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ARHS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ARHS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 463 reported | 5.4% | 3.9% | 58% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 366 reported | -3.2% | 6.0% | 40% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 458 reported | 2.9% | 5.1% | 39% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ARHS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 3 | 7.2B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 87 | |
| 3 | 154.7B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 272.3B INR (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 266 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 47 | 76 | |
| 266 | 6.0B MYR (≈$1.3B) | 47 | 54 | |
| 266 | 931M USD | 47 | 44 | |
| 270 | 10.4B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 46 | 62 | |
| 270 | 1.7B USD | 46 | 44 | |
| 270 | 1.9B EUR (≈$2.1B) | 46 | 33 | |
| 270 | 34.5B ZAR (≈$1.9B) | 46 | 54 | |
| 274 | 8.5B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 45 | 48 | |
| 274 | 13.2B SEK (≈$1.3B) | 45 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score