Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ardent Health, Inc.
How Ardent Health, Inc. stacks up
ARDT · against 399 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
22/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #320 of 400 · scores higher than 19% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score53 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including ARDT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 22?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 93% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -68.9% vs peer median 9.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.3% vs peer median 6.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 7.2% vs peer median 5.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ARDT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ARDT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 403 reported | 3.3% | 6.2% | 40% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 222 reported | -68.9% | 9.8% | 5% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 392 reported | 7.2% | 7.0% | 51% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ARDT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.9B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 1 | 27.6B SEK (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 99 | 96 | |
| 1 | 2.8B USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 320 | 10.4B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 22 | 42 | |
| 320 | 6.3B CNY (≈$887M) | 22 | 52 | |
| 320 | 7.2B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 22 | 44 | |
| 320 | 7.0B CNY (≈$977M) | 22 | 39 | |
| 320 | 1.7B USD | 22 | 44 | |
| 320 | 1.9B USD | 22 | 38 | |
| 327 | 10.6B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 21 | 43 | |
| 327 | 1.43T KRW (≈$1.0B) | 21 | 55 | |
| 327 | 31.0B THB (≈$867M) | 21 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score