Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc.
How Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc. stacks up
ARCO · against 471 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
93/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #25 of 472 · scores higher than 94% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score43 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including ARCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 93?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 1.0% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 87% of peers. EBITDA yield: 25.2% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 97% of peers. Earnings yield: 14.8% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ARCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ARCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 468 reported | 17.9% | 5.1% | 98% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 481 reported | 18.2% | 9.4% | 89% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 142 reported | 6.9% | 6.9% | 50% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 470 reported | 57.9% | 55.9% | 51% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ARCO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 151.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 6.9B HKD (≈$885M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 20 | 18.0B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 94 | 54 | |
| 20 | 112.3B JPY (≈$764M) | 94 | 73 | |
| 25 | 133.8B JPY (≈$910M) | 93 | 70 | |
| 25 | 392.0B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 93 | 77 | |
| 25 | 1.4B USD | 93 | 65 | |
| 25 | 1.3B USD | 93 | 65 | |
| 25 | 17.7B ZAR (≈$972M) | 93 | 61 | |
| 30 | 1.67T KRW (≈$1.2B) | 92 | 48 | |
| 30 | 4.3B MYR (≈$937M) | 92 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score