Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
APTV · against 204 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #107 of 205 · scores higher than 48% of peers · safety percentile 35
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)21 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including APTV · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | APTV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 200 reported | 0.65× | 0.70× | 53% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 205 reported | 1.36 | 0.87 | 17% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 201 reported | 2.02× | 1.43× | 75% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 2 | 7.3B SGD (≈$5.5B) | 97 | 69 | |
| 3 | 9.5B CHF (≈$10.9B) | 96 | 37 | |
| 4 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 5 | 7.8B EUR (≈$8.6B) | 94 | 61 | |
| 103 | 7.4B USD | 36 | 64 | |
| 104 | 4.5B GBP (≈$5.8B) | 36 | 55 | |
| 105 | 5.9B GBP (≈$7.6B) | 36 | 50 | |
| 106 | 39.5B CNY (≈$5.5B) | 36 | 23 | |
| 107 | 8.6B USD | 35 | 49 | |
| 108 | 8.8B USD | 35 | 55 | |
| 109 | 1.93T JPY (≈$13.1B) | 35 | 53 | |
| 110 | 767.7B JPY (≈$5.2B) | 34 | 59 | |
| 111 | 6.5B EUR (≈$7.2B) | 34 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score