Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Appian Corporation
How Appian Corporation stacks up
APPN · against 407 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
23/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #342 of 408 · scores higher than 15% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score40 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including APPN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 23?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.3% vs peer median 2.2%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 75% of peers. EBITDA yield: 1.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.2% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = APPN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | APPN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 401 reported | -0.3% | 2.4% | 17% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 411 reported | 1.1% | 4.5% | 18% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 178 reported | 2.2% | 3.3% | 43% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 403 reported | -3.0% | 27.4% | 1% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around APPN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 2 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 2 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 2 | 40.9B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 337 | 2.6B USD | 24 | 24 | |
| 337 | 2.0B USD | 24 | 22 | |
| 337 | 4.5B EUR (≈$4.9B) | 24 | 23 | |
| 342 | 37.9B CNY (≈$5.3B) | 23 | 14 | |
| 342 | 3.5B USD | 23 | 35 | |
| 342 | 3.4B USD | 23 | 39 | |
| 342 | 1.8B USD | 23 | 56 | |
| 342 | 2.1B USD | 23 | 9 | |
| 347 | 28.9B HKD (≈$3.7B) | 22 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score