Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Amphenol Corporation
How Amphenol Corporation stacks up
APH · against 37 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
95/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #4 of 38 · scores higher than 89% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score9 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including APH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 95?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 79% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 60.2% vs peer median 11.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 95% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 32.2% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 95% of peers. Revenue growth: 54.2% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = APH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | APH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 38 reported | 54.2% | 18.8% | 97% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 31 reported | 60.2% | 33.0% | 70% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 38 reported | 32.2% | 9.4% | 97% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around APH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 125.2B USD | 99 | 70 | |
| 2 | 164.9B USD | 98 | 89 | |
| 3 | 25.82T JPY (≈$175.6B) | 96 | 73 | |
| 4 | 207.6B USD | 95 | 61 | |
| 4 | 259.7B USD | 95 | 63 | |
| 6 | 250.5B USD | 92 | 43 | |
| 7 | 154.6B USD | 91 | 58 | |
| 8 | 832.5B CNY (≈$116.5B) | 90 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score