Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
APC · against 102 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #67 of 103 · scores higher than 35% of peers · safety percentile 34
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)10 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including APC · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | APC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 98 reported | 3.04× | 0.51× | 3% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 101 reported | Not reported | 0.43 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 104 reported | 1.18× | 1.46× | 40% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 3 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 4 | 1.2B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 5 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 50 | |
| 63 | 1.1B USD | 40 | 55 | |
| 64 | 906M EUR (≈$997M) | 39 | 26 | |
| 65 | 12.7B NOK (≈$1.2B) | 37 | 48 | |
| 66 | 1.2B USD | 36 | 49 | |
| 67 | 665M USD | 34 | 30 | |
| 68 | 4.2B CNY (≈$595M) | 34 | 28 | |
| 69 | 580M CAD (≈$424M) | 33 | 47 | |
| 70 | 6.6B CNY (≈$929M) | 33 | 35 | |
| 71 | 9.2B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 32 | 14 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score