Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.
How Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. stacks up
APAM · against 153 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Growth
49/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #93 of 154 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including APAM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 10.0% vs peer median 10.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 10.2% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 9.8% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = APAM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | APAM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 179 reported | 9.8% | 10.5% | 49% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 131 reported | 10.2% | 11.4% | 49% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 138 reported | 10.0% | 11.5% | 40% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around APAM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 3 | 601M USD | 98 | 72 | |
| 3 | 843M USD | 98 | ||
| 5 | 282M USD | 97 | ||
| 89 | 67.1B USD | 51 | 51 | |
| 89 | 4.2B USD | 51 | 55 | |
| 89 | 113M USD | 51 | 68 | |
| 89 | 24.1B USD | 51 | 54 | |
| 93 | 2.7B USD | 49 | 63 | |
| 93 | 4.5B USD | 49 | 21 | |
| 93 | 128.0B USD | 49 | 61 | |
| 93 | 1.5B USD | 49 | 58 | |
| 97 | 709M USD | 48 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score