Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to APA Corporation
How APA Corporation stacks up
APA · against 55 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
88/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #4 of 56 · scores higher than 91% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score11 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including APA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 88?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 76% of peers. Earnings yield: 10.3% vs peer median 5.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 81% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 12.6% vs peer median 6.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 90% of peers. EBITDA yield: 30.6% vs peer median 12.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = APA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | APA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 57 reported | 9.9% | 7.0% | 70% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 54 reported | 27.1% | 14.0% | 92% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 36 reported | 12.6% | 6.4% | 83% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 53 reported | 41.9% | 51.5% | 35% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around APA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 66.2B HKD (≈$8.5B) | 95 | 68 | |
| 1 | 571.7B THB (≈$16.0B) | 95 | 62 | |
| 3 | 229.8B NOK (≈$21.8B) | 89 | 55 | |
| 4 | 16.7B USD | 88 | 70 | |
| 4 | 20.8B USD | 88 | 83 | |
| 4 | 1.96T INR (≈$23.5B) | 88 | 70 | |
| 7 | 1.78T JPY (≈$12.1B) | 85 | 58 | |
| 8 | 3.73T JPY (≈$25.4B) | 84 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score