Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AOSL · against 613 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #333 of 614 · scores higher than 46% of peers · safety percentile 52
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)56 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including AOSL · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio and debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AOSL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 584 reported | 0.04× | 0.22× | 80% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 593 reported | 2.64 | 0.67 | 2% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 611 reported | 3.44× | 1.85× | 81% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 5 | 553M EUR (≈$608M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 329 | 555M CAD (≈$405M) | 53 | 55 | |
| 330 | 8.1B HKD (≈$1.0B) | 52 | 40 | |
| 331 | 6.2B SEK (≈$619M) | 52 | 37 | |
| 332 | 17.0B TWD (≈$528M) | 52 | 71 | |
| 333 | 671M USD | 52 | 31 | |
| 334 | 1.2B USD | 52 | 25 | |
| 335 | 469M EUR (≈$516M) | 52 | 64 | |
| 336 | 3.2B CNY (≈$443M) | 51 | 45 | |
| 337 | 28.9B TWD (≈$896M) | 51 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score