Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to A. O. Smith Corporation
How A. O. Smith Corporation stacks up
AOS · against 362 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #123 of 363 · scores higher than 65% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score52 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including AOS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.2% vs peer median 6.9%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.7% vs peer median 3.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 74% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 7.3% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AOS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AOS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 349 reported | 5.6% | 4.2% | 73% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 364 reported | 8.5% | 7.3% | 64% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 183 reported | 7.4% | 4.0% | 84% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 346 reported | 21.2% | 34.2% | 29% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AOS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 9.3B SGD (≈$7.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 3 | 6.28T KRW (≈$4.5B) | 98 | 53 | |
| 3 | 37.8B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 86 | |
| 3 | 49.8B HKD (≈$6.4B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 123 | 10.77T KRW (≈$7.8B) | 62 | 45 | |
| 123 | 1.07T JPY (≈$7.3B) | 62 | 40 | |
| 123 | 959.9B JPY (≈$6.5B) | 62 | 62 | |
| 123 | 1.08T JPY (≈$7.4B) | 62 | 47 | |
| 123 | 8.7B USD | 62 | 57 | |
| 123 | 5.2B USD | 62 | 44 | |
| 130 | 69.3B CNY (≈$9.7B) | 61 | 71 | |
| 130 | 7.4B USD | 61 | 60 | |
| 130 | 16.2B USD | 61 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score