Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Angel Studios, Inc.
How Angel Studios, Inc. stacks up
ANGX · against 146 other Communication Services companies listed in US-listed
Growth
98/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #4 of 147 · scores higher than 97% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including ANGX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 98?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 99% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 62.1% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 100% of peers. Revenue growth: 233.2% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ANGX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ANGX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 149 reported | 233.2% | 5.8% | 99% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 78 reported | Not reported | 9.4% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 145 reported | 62.1% | 4.7% | 99% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ANGX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.5B USD | 100 | 81 | |
| 2 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 71 | |
| 2 | 35.4B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 4 | 648M USD | 98 | 26 | |
| 4 | 639M USD | 98 | 46 | |
| 4 | 41.2B USD | 98 | 39 | |
| 7 | 82.5B USD | 97 | 70 | |
| 7 | 1.0B USD | 97 | 87 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score