Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ANDG · against 505 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #487 of 506 · scores higher than 4% of peers · safety percentile 4
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including ANDG · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ANDG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 495 reported | 13.17× | 0.47× | 1% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 495 reported | Not reported | 0.51 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 494 reported | 2.19× | 1.50× | 73% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 92.4B JPY (≈$628M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 4.7B CNY (≈$659M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 4 | 5.4B CNY (≈$758M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 4 | 2.6B CAD (≈$1.9B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 483 | 1.2B USD | 5 | 25 | |
| 484 | 5.4B CNY (≈$757M) | 5 | 17 | |
| 485 | 4.7B CNY (≈$660M) | 5 | 1 | |
| 486 | 8.6B NOK (≈$816M) | 4 | 49 | |
| 487 | 1.2B USD | 4 | 19 | |
| 488 | 611M USD | 4 | 37 | |
| 489 | 22.5B SEK (≈$2.2B) | 4 | 33 | |
| 490 | 1.4B GBP (≈$1.8B) | 4 | 45 | |
| 491 | 2.0B EUR (≈$2.1B) | 4 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score