Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ANDE · against 200 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #159 of 201 · scores higher than 21% of peers · safety percentile 29
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)16 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including ANDE · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ANDE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 194 reported | 0.66× | 0.33× | 31% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 197 reported | 0.66 | 0.35 | 19% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 191 reported | 1.51× | 1.84× | 37% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 3 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2.74T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 49 | |
| 5 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 155 | 18.5B CNY (≈$2.6B) | 32 | 29 | |
| 156 | 11.2B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 31 | 19 | |
| 157 | 2.2B USD | 30 | 22 | |
| 158 | 4.1B USD | 29 | 63 | |
| 159 | 2.1B USD | 29 | 42 | |
| 160 | 35.1B MXN (≈$1.9B) | 29 | 50 | |
| 161 | 1.3B USD | 28 | 23 | |
| 162 | 1.4B USD | 27 | 22 | |
| 163 | 3.6B AUD (≈$2.4B) | 26 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score