Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AMPH · against 473 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #366 of 474 · scores higher than 23% of peers · safety percentile 24
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)38 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including AMPH · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AMPH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 446 reported | 0.90× | 0.20× | 17% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 447 reported | 0.90 | 0.47 | 29% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 460 reported | 2.40× | 2.83× | 45% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 100 | ||
| 4 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 35 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 99 | ||
| 362 | 2.0B USD | 25 | 26 | |
| 363 | 73.5B TRY (≈$2.2B) | 24 | 68 | |
| 364 | 866M EUR (≈$952M) | 24 | 65 | |
| 365 | 1.3B USD | 24 | 48 | |
| 366 | 1.2B USD | 24 | 52 | |
| 367 | 1.62T KRW (≈$1.2B) | 24 | 50 | |
| 368 | 6.4B HKD (≈$821M) | 24 | 54 | |
| 369 | 1.7B EUR (≈$1.9B) | 24 | 58 | |
| 370 | 15.4B HKD (≈$2.0B) | 23 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score