Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
How Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. stacks up
AMD · against 9 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
24/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #9 of 10 · scores higher than 11% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score2 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including AMD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 24?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 74% of peers. EBITDA yield: 1.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 68% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.8% vs peer median 2.2%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 66% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.1% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AMD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AMD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 8 reported | 0.8% | 6.0% | 14% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 10 reported | 1.2% | 11.0% | 11% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 10 reported | 1.1% | 5.1% | 11% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 4 reported | 8.5% | 9.5% | 33% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AMD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 803.7B EUR (≈$884.1B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 2 | 1429.37T KRW (≈$1.03T) | 97 | 76 | |
| 2 | 1.08T USD | 97 | 84 | |
| 4 | 994.08T KRW (≈$715.7B) | 95 | 81 | |
| 5 | 965.7B USD | 89 | 84 | |
| 5 | 1.07T USD | 89 | 79 | |
| 7 | 406.0B USD | 51 | 54 | |
| 8 | 598.2B USD | 35 | 60 | |
| 9 | 790.0B USD | 24 | 56 | |
| 10 | 421.5B USD | 22 | 78 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score