Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to AMC Global Media Inc.
How AMC Global Media Inc. stacks up
AMCX · against 107 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Valuation
76/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #31 of 108 · scores higher than 71% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score8 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including AMCX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 76?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -5.7% vs peer median 2.9%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 75% of peers. EBITDA yield: 8.8% vs peer median 8.6%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 96% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 54.9% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AMCX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AMCX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 111 reported | -6.6% | 0.4% | 24% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 112 reported | 15.6% | 8.0% | 68% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 40 reported | 57.2% | 8.6% | 95% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 112 reported | 273.7% | 64.7% | 95% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AMCX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 694.0B KRW (≈$500M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 2.6B HKD (≈$329M) | 99 | 80 | |
| 2 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 4 | 659M USD | 97 | 81 | |
| 5 | 906.5B KRW (≈$653M) | 96 | 47 | |
| 27 | 47.1B JPY (≈$320M) | 80 | 85 | |
| 28 | 619M USD | 79 | 49 | |
| 29 | 2.8B HKD (≈$353M) | 78 | 83 | |
| 30 | 499M EUR (≈$549M) | 77 | 48 | |
| 31 | 333M USD | 76 | 36 | |
| 31 | 2.4B DKK (≈$363M) | 76 | 60 | |
| 33 | 4.1B HKD (≈$519M) | 75 | 49 | |
| 33 | 7.9B TWD (≈$244M) | 75 | 73 | |
| 35 | 497M USD | 74 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score