Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to AMC Global Media Inc.
How AMC Global Media Inc. stacks up
AMCX · against 146 other Communication Services companies listed in US-listed
Growth
23/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #124 of 147 · scores higher than 16% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score13 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including AMCX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 23?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 90% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -9.6% vs peer median 3.0%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 79% of peers. Revenue growth: -4.6% vs peer median 3.0%
- Still loss-making, but the loss per share narrowed. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AMCX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AMCX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 149 reported | -4.6% | 5.8% | 14% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 78 reported | Not reported | 9.4% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 145 reported | -9.6% | 4.7% | 4% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AMCX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.5B USD | 100 | 81 | |
| 2 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 71 | |
| 2 | 35.4B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 4 | 648M USD | 98 | 26 | |
| 4 | 639M USD | 98 | 46 | |
| 120 | 630M USD | 26 | 27 | |
| 120 | 457M USD | 26 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score