Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AMC · against 113 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Ranked #91 of 114 · scores higher than 19% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including AMC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
| Metric | AMC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 113 reported | -31.1% | 2.8% | 5% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 115 reported | 5.9% | 7.6% | 34% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 52 reported | -0.8% | 6.2% | 25% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 111 reported | -49.6% | 45.0% | 0% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 4.5B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 1.57T ARS (≈$1.6B) | 96 | 74 | |
| 4 | 6.15T KRW (≈$4.4B) | 94 | 64 | |
| 4 | 1.9B USD | 94 | 79 | |
| 86 | 14.7B SEK (≈$1.5B) | 27 | 57 | |
| 89 | 5.0B AUD (≈$3.3B) | 26 | 49 | |
| 89 | 2.0B CHF (≈$2.3B) | 26 | 34 | |
| 91 | 12.2B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 24 | 58 | |
| 91 | 2.9B USD | 24 | 28 | |
| 93 | 17.5B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 23 | 51 | |
| 94 | 17.4B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 22 | 50 | |
| 95 | 20.7B CNY (≈$2.9B) | 20 | 41 | |
| 95 | 530.0B JPY (≈$3.6B) | 20 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score