Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
How AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. stacks up
AMC · against 114 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Growth
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #48 of 115 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score16 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including AMC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 61% of peers. Revenue growth: 6.4% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 66% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.1% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AMC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AMC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 116 reported | 6.4% | 3.6% | 57% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 71 reported | Not reported | 11.8% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 113 reported | 7.1% | 3.7% | 68% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AMC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35.4B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 2 | 15.2B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 3 | 1.57T ARS (≈$1.6B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 4 | 3.2B USD | 95 | 57 | |
| 5 | 3.6B NZD (≈$2.1B) | 94 | 53 | |
| 44 | 5.4B USD | 65 | 59 | |
| 45 | 3.9B GBP (≈$5.1B) | 64 | 68 | |
| 46 | 20.7B CNY (≈$2.9B) | 63 | 41 | |
| 46 | 3.1B USD | 63 | 67 | |
| 48 | 2.9B USD | 62 | 28 | |
| 48 | 2.6B USD | 62 | 54 | |
| 50 | 6.15T KRW (≈$4.4B) | 61 | 64 | |
| 50 | 4.8B EUR (≈$5.3B) | 61 | 47 | |
| 52 | 3.8B NZD (≈$2.3B) | 60 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score