Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AMBP · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #188 of 356 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score46 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including AMBP · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | AMBP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 353 reported | 1.7% | 5.3% | 19% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 363 reported | 11.4% | 9.4% | 64% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 144 reported | 11.0% | 6.1% | 78% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 356 reported | -28.1% | 44.7% | 1% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 248.4B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 3 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 3 | 8.6B BRL (≈$1.5B) | 97 | 81 | |
| 5 | 12.1B HKD (≈$1.6B) | 96 | 56 | |
| 188 | 29.7B CNY (≈$4.2B) | 50 | 49 | |
| 188 | 14.3B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 50 | 42 | |
| 188 | 322.1B JPY (≈$2.2B) | 50 | 54 | |
| 188 | 2.9B USD | 50 | 28 | |
| 188 | 2.7B USD | 50 | 43 | |
| 188 | 4.2B USD | 50 | 56 | |
| 195 | 23.7B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 49 | 68 | |
| 195 | 2.2B USD | 49 | 64 | |
| 195 | 3.2B USD | 49 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score