Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AMBP · against 360 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #327 of 361 · scores higher than 9% of peers · safety percentile 8
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)39 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including AMBP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AMBP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 350 reported | Not reported | 0.53× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 356 reported | 0.53 | 0.70 | 63% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 348 reported | 1.07× | 1.47× | 24% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B CAD (≈$1.9B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 98 | 82 | |
| 3 | 14.5B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 4 | 404.1B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 97 | 80 | |
| 5 | 2.81T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 97 | 68 | |
| 323 | 2.2B GBP (≈$2.8B) | 10 | 45 | |
| 324 | 2.1B USD | 9 | 30 | |
| 325 | 205.2B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 9 | 54 | |
| 326 | 3.1B GBP (≈$4.0B) | 8 | 40 | |
| 327 | 2.7B USD | 8 | 43 | |
| 328 | 1.6B USD | 8 | 63 | |
| 329 | 42.1B MXN (≈$2.3B) | 8 | 63 | |
| 330 | 26.1B CNY (≈$3.6B) | 8 | 4 | |
| 331 | 25.0B HKD (≈$3.2B) | 8 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score