Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ambarella, Inc.
How Ambarella, Inc. stacks up
AMBA · against 436 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
15/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #391 of 437 · scores higher than 9% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score40 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including AMBA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 15?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -2.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -2.1% vs peer median 2.2%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 70% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 0.4% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AMBA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AMBA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 431 reported | -2.1% | 2.4% | 11% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 442 reported | -2.0% | 4.5% | 6% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 171 reported | 0.4% | 3.4% | 25% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 433 reported | 22.7% | 29.8% | 35% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AMBA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 3 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 391 | 26.4B CNY (≈$3.7B) | 15 | 33 | |
| 391 | 10.0B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 15 | 31 | |
| 391 | 24.3B CNY (≈$3.4B) | 15 | 48 | |
| 391 | 12.2B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 15 | 38 | |
| 391 | 2.7B USD | 15 | 34 | |
| 391 | 2.3B EUR (≈$2.5B) | 15 | 35 | |
| 391 | 3.5B USD | 15 | 50 | |
| 391 | 1.6B USD | 15 | 72 | |
| 400 | 13.1B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 10 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score