Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AMBA · against 440 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #265 of 441 · scores higher than 40% of peers · safety percentile 42
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)50 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including AMBA · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity and current ratio, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AMBA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 428 reported | 0.02× | 0.26× | 86% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 424 reported | 2.38 | 0.91 | 4% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 436 reported | 2.85× | 1.89× | 71% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 2 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 261 | 2.3B EUR (≈$2.5B) | 42 | 49 | |
| 262 | 1.5B USD | 42 | 54 | |
| 263 | 90.9B TWD (≈$2.8B) | 42 | 59 | |
| 264 | 410.6B JPY (≈$2.8B) | 42 | 61 | |
| 265 | 2.7B USD | 42 | 34 | |
| 266 | 48.6B TWD (≈$1.5B) | 41 | 18 | |
| 267 | 18.4B HKD (≈$2.3B) | 41 | 22 | |
| 268 | 16.8B CNY (≈$2.3B) | 41 | 47 | |
| 269 | 4.2B EUR (≈$4.6B) | 40 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score