Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Applied Materials, Inc.
How Applied Materials, Inc. stacks up
AMAT · against 496 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #271 of 497 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score58 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including AMAT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 3.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 1.9% vs peer median 2.7%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.1% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AMAT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AMAT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 495 reported | 3.0% | 1.9% | 64% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 499 reported | 3.4% | 4.0% | 46% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 465 reported | 1.9% | 3.3% | 34% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 490 reported | 8.5% | 22.1% | 20% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AMAT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 5 | 662M USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 265 | 4.4B USD | 44 | 62 | |
| 265 | 1.4B USD | 44 | 54 | |
| 265 | 42.1B USD | 44 | 69 | |
| 265 | 16.6B USD | 44 | 51 | |
| 271 | 303.1B USD | 43 | 58 | |
| 271 | 1.59T USD | 43 | 66 | |
| 271 | 51.9B USD | 43 | 63 | |
| 271 | 9.6B USD | 43 | 73 | |
| 271 | 3.1B USD | 43 | 25 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score