Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Antero Midstream Corporation
How Antero Midstream Corporation stacks up
AM · against 75 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
24/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #64 of 76 · scores higher than 15% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score6 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including AM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 24?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 75% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 0.6% vs peer median 6.2%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 61% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.0% vs peer median 5.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 77 reported | 6.8% | 6.6% | 53% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 74 reported | Not reported | 13.7% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 51 reported | 0.6% | 8.1% | 18% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 72 reported | 22.3% | 55.0% | 7% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 66.2B HKD (≈$8.5B) | 95 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.4B USD | 95 | 68 | |
| 2 | 571.7B THB (≈$16.0B) | 95 | 62 | |
| 5 | 5.1B EUR (≈$5.6B) | 92 | 71 | |
| 60 | 29.1B AUD (≈$19.2B) | 33 | 39 | |
| 61 | 34.2B MYR (≈$7.5B) | 32 | 58 | |
| 62 | 7.0B USD | 31 | 36 | |
| 63 | 286.67T IDR (≈$17.8B) | 27 | 62 | |
| 64 | 9.9B USD | 24 | 46 | |
| 64 | 5.0B USD | 24 | 46 | |
| 66 | 15.9B USD | 23 | 59 | |
| 67 | 12.5B USD | 21 | 54 | |
| 68 | 9.2B USD | 20 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score