Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AM · against 78 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #74 of 79 · scores higher than 6% of peers · safety percentile 12
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including AM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 79 reported | 1.45× | 0.60× | 10% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 78 reported | 0.69 | 0.52 | 32% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 77 reported | 0.84× | 1.22× | 24% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 2 | 15.9B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 7.5B AUD (≈$5.0B) | 94 | 51 | |
| 4 | 286.67T IDR (≈$17.8B) | 93 | 62 | |
| 5 | 42.6B CNY (≈$6.0B) | 83 | 63 | |
| 70 | 5.5B USD | 16 | 51 | |
| 71 | 15.9B CAD (≈$11.6B) | 14 | 26 | |
| 72 | 7.5B USD | 13 | 68 | |
| 73 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 13 | 75 | |
| 74 | 9.9B USD | 12 | 46 | |
| 75 | 7.3B USD | 12 | 43 | |
| 76 | 18.1B USD | 11 | 53 | |
| 77 | 8.4B EUR (≈$9.3B) | 11 | 38 | |
| 78 | 6.7B USD | 5 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score