Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Antero Midstream Corporation
How Antero Midstream Corporation stacks up
AM · against 187 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Growth
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #88 of 188 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score18 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including AM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -10.6% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 63% of peers. Revenue growth: 6.9% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 76% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.6% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 192 reported | 6.9% | 7.9% | 47% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 141 reported | -10.6% | 2.9% | 39% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 186 reported | 7.6% | 1.0% | 66% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 2 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 49 | |
| 5 | 4.1B USD | 98 | 60 | |
| 84 | 441.9B USD | 64 | 57 | |
| 84 | 4.5B USD | 64 | 44 | |
| 86 | 81.0B USD | 63 | 47 | |
| 86 | 428M USD | 63 | 57 | |
| 88 | 9.9B USD | 62 | 46 | |
| 88 | 30.5B USD | 62 | 57 | |
| 88 | 52.4B USD | 62 | 57 | |
| 88 | 1.2B USD | 62 | 49 | |
| 92 | 883M USD | 61 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score