Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ALSN · against 184 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #144 of 185 · scores higher than 22% of peers · safety percentile 16
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)29 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including ALSN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ALSN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 182 reported | 2.12× | 0.70× | 17% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 185 reported | 0.98 | 0.86 | 39% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 180 reported | 1.81× | 1.36× | 69% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 2 | 7.3B SGD (≈$5.5B) | 97 | 69 | |
| 3 | 9.5B CHF (≈$10.9B) | 96 | 37 | |
| 4 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 5 | 7.8B EUR (≈$8.6B) | 94 | 61 | |
| 140 | 15.1B USD | 18 | 54 | |
| 141 | 5.5B USD | 18 | 43 | |
| 142 | 4.5B GBP (≈$5.8B) | 17 | 56 | |
| 143 | 17.0B CAD (≈$12.4B) | 17 | 59 | |
| 144 | 9.8B USD | 16 | 57 | |
| 145 | 13.1B USD | 16 | 56 | |
| 146 | 5.1B USD | 16 | 19 | |
| 147 | 4.6B GBP (≈$6.0B) | 16 | 42 | |
| 148 | 14.5B USD | 16 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score