Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
How Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. stacks up
ALSN · against 185 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
81/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #66 of 186 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score32 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including ALSN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 81?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its operating margin, return on assets and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 69% of peers. Return on invested capital: 11.9% vs peer median 7.3%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 76% of peers. Return on assets: 6.1% vs peer median 3.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 91% of peers. Operating margin: 19.6% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ALSN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ALSN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 178 reported | 11.9% | 11.2% | 54% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 187 reported | 19.6% | 10.1% | 85% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 177 reported | 6.1% | 5.0% | 58% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 171 reported | 28.3% | 16.7% | 76% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 187 reported | 37.8% | 33.4% | 56% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ALSN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 2 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 11.5B USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 2 | 10.7B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 2 | 5.2B GBP (≈$6.8B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 62 | 5.8B EUR (≈$6.4B) | 82 | 48 | |
| 62 | 6.8B USD | 82 | 49 | |
| 62 | 13.8B USD | 82 | 66 | |
| 62 | 5.9B USD | 82 | 36 | |
| 66 | 9.8B USD | 81 | 57 | |
| 66 | 927.0B INR (≈$11.1B) | 81 | 70 | |
| 66 | 15.0B EUR (≈$16.4B) | 81 | 50 | |
| 69 | 151.9B HKD (≈$19.4B) | 80 | 77 | |
| 69 | 101.0B HKD (≈$12.9B) | 80 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score