Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to REalloys Inc.
How REalloys Inc. stacks up
ALOY · against 485 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Profitability
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #472 of 486 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score58 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including ALOY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its operating margin, return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 100% of peers. Operating margin: -3619.3% vs peer median 7.6%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on assets: -68.7% vs peer median 2.5%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on invested capital: -146.7% vs peer median 6.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ALOY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ALOY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 460 reported | -146.7% | 4.2% | 1% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 475 reported | -3619.3% | 4.8% | 0% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 472 reported | -68.7% | 1.3% | 0% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 466 reported | Not reported | 2.6% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 505 reported | 29.7% | 17.3% | 76% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ALOY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9B MYR (≈$416M) | 98 | 81 | |
| 1 | 436M GBP (≈$566M) | 98 | 76 | |
| 1 | 934M AUD (≈$617M) | 98 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.0B AUD (≈$673M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 1 | 635M USD | 98 | 79 | |
| 472 | 3.0B CNY (≈$419M) | 0 | 16 | |
| 472 | 3.2B CNY (≈$455M) | 0 | 11 | |
| 472 | 4.4B CNY (≈$613M) | 0 | 34 | |
| 472 | 1.6B CNY (≈$218M) | 0 | 1 | |
| 472 | 420M USD | 0 | 61 | |
| 472 | 277M USD | 0 | 30 | |
| 472 | 412M USD | 0 | 21 | |
| 472 | 562M USD | 0 | 6 | |
| 472 | 398M AUD (≈$263M) | 0 | 31 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score