Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Allegion plc
How Allegion plc stacks up
ALLE · against 225 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
59/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #113 of 226 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score35 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including ALLE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 6.2% vs peer median 7.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 72% of peers. Revenue growth: 10.6% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ALLE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ALLE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 227 reported | 10.6% | 6.6% | 69% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 208 reported | 6.2% | 11.9% | 37% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 224 reported | 5.9% | 6.1% | 49% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ALLE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 1.22T INR (≈$14.6B) | 99 | 72 | |
| 2 | 12.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 4 | 85.2B CNY (≈$11.9B) | 98 | 75 | |
| 4 | 16.48T KRW (≈$11.9B) | 98 | 61 | |
| 104 | 15.1B USD | 61 | 57 | |
| 110 | 14.33T KRW (≈$10.3B) | 60 | 36 | |
| 110 | 224.6B SEK (≈$22.5B) | 60 | 56 | |
| 110 | 18.4B USD | 60 | 57 | |
| 113 | 16.1B USD | 59 | 58 | |
| 113 | 17.1B USD | 59 | 42 | |
| 115 | 1.44T JPY (≈$9.8B) | 58 | 73 | |
| 115 | 14.6B NZD (≈$8.7B) | 58 | 50 | |
| 117 | 2.06T JPY (≈$14.0B) | 57 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score