Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Alight, Inc.
How Alight, Inc. stacks up
ALIT · against 593 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
91/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #58 of 594 · scores higher than 90% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score72 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including ALIT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 91?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -748.5% vs peer median 2.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 97% of peers. EBITDA yield: 21.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 100% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 52.4% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ALIT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ALIT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 578 reported | -748.5% | 1.5% | 0% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 610 reported | 21.3% | 3.8% | 98% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 179 reported | 52.4% | 1.9% | 100% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 587 reported | 383.3% | 43.2% | 99% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ALIT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 5 | 2.4B HKD (≈$301M) | 98 | 42 | |
| 58 | 6.0B HKD (≈$767M) | 91 | 45 | |
| 58 | 3.3B HKD (≈$419M) | 91 | 52 | |
| 58 | 77.4B JPY (≈$526M) | 91 | 69 | |
| 58 | 86.7B JPY (≈$590M) | 91 | 70 | |
| 58 | 475M USD | 91 | 31 | |
| 64 | 4.1B CNY (≈$579M) | 90 | 52 | |
| 64 | 4.4B CNY (≈$616M) | 90 | 83 | |
| 64 | 26.3B TWD (≈$814M) | 90 | 50 | |
| 64 | 63.1B JPY (≈$429M) | 90 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score