Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Align Technology, Inc.
How Align Technology, Inc. stacks up
ALGN · against 147 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
39/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #112 of 148 · scores higher than 23% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score20 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including ALGN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 39?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 65% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -3.6% vs peer median 9.8%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.5% vs peer median 5.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.4% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ALGN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ALGN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 149 reported | 4.4% | 10.2% | 28% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 108 reported | -3.6% | 14.1% | 30% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 143 reported | 3.5% | 10.9% | 18% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ALGN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 9.3B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 14.87T KRW (≈$10.7B) | 97 | 76 | |
| 3 | 21.4B USD | 97 | 67 | |
| 3 | 7.3B USD | 97 | 74 | |
| 108 | 77.1B DKK (≈$11.6B) | 41 | 47 | |
| 110 | 9.2B USD | 40 | 47 | |
| 110 | 9.7B AUD (≈$6.4B) | 40 | 52 | |
| 112 | 45.1B HKD (≈$5.8B) | 39 | 53 | |
| 112 | 10.8B USD | 39 | 54 | |
| 112 | 558.5B INR (≈$6.7B) | 39 | 47 | |
| 115 | 884.9B JPY (≈$6.0B) | 38 | 61 | |
| 115 | 1.17T JPY (≈$8.0B) | 38 | 58 | |
| 115 | 593.2B INR (≈$7.1B) | 38 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score