Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ALGM · against 305 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #156 of 306 · scores higher than 49% of peers · safety percentile 47
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)37 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including ALGM · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ALGM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 296 reported | 0.31× | 0.30× | 48% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 289 reported | 1.99 | 1.01 | 8% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 303 reported | 3.70× | 1.84× | 83% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 2 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 4 | 3.5B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 5 | 625.8B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 152 | 4.8B USD | 48 | 56 | |
| 153 | 103.2B TWD (≈$3.2B) | 48 | 63 | |
| 154 | 8.0B USD | 48 | 37 | |
| 155 | 28.4B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 47 | 59 | |
| 156 | 6.3B USD | 47 | 47 | |
| 157 | 128.4B TWD (≈$4.0B) | 47 | 43 | |
| 158 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 46 | 56 | |
| 159 | 148.5B TWD (≈$4.6B) | 46 | 64 | |
| 160 | 5.20T KRW (≈$3.7B) | 46 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score