Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Acadia Realty Trust
How Acadia Realty Trust stacks up
AKR · against 164 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
74/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #31 of 165 · scores higher than 81% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score17 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including AKR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 74?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 70% of peers. Earnings yield: 8.0% vs peer median 5.3%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.9% vs peer median 6.5%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.7% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AKR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AKR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 175 reported | 1.8% | 5.5% | 20% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 164 reported | 5.2% | 5.5% | 44% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 77 reported | 5.9% | 6.9% | 41% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 178 reported | 88.9% | 105.2% | 37% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AKR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 213.1B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 97 | 81 | |
| 2 | 13.2B HKD (≈$1.7B) | 96 | 82 | |
| 2 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 4 | 4.3B USD | 93 | 94 | |
| 5 | 46.8B TWD (≈$1.5B) | 92 | 82 | |
| 26 | 53.8B ZAR (≈$3.0B) | 78 | 59 | |
| 28 | 1.5B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 76 | 74 | |
| 29 | 7.6B AUD (≈$5.0B) | 75 | 63 | |
| 29 | 1.7B EUR (≈$1.9B) | 75 | 72 | |
| 31 | 2.8B USD | 74 | 68 | |
| 31 | 3.9B SGD (≈$3.0B) | 74 | 63 | |
| 33 | 1.7B EUR (≈$1.9B) | 73 | 55 | |
| 33 | 1.6B USD | 73 | 65 | |
| 35 | 29.4B CNY (≈$4.1B) | 72 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score