Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AKO-A · against 156 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #110 of 157 · scores higher than 30% of peers · safety percentile 33
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)13 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including AKO-A · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AKO-A | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 155 reported | 0.89× | 0.39× | 25% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 154 reported | Not reported | 0.35 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 150 reported | 1.61× | 1.61× | 50% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 2 | 2.74T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 49 | |
| 3 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 4 | 398.9B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 77 | |
| 5 | 3.1B USD | 97 | 89 | |
| 106 | 77.6B TRY (≈$2.3B) | 34 | 56 | |
| 107 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 320.1B JPY (≈$2.2B) |
| 34 |
| 47 |
| 108 | 26.4B CNY (≈$3.7B) | 34 | 33 |
| 109 | 5.0B USD | 34 | 50 |
| 110 | 3.9B USD | 33 | 64 |
| 111 | 7.2B SAR (≈$1.9B) | 33 | 46 |
| 112 | 1.8B GBP (≈$2.3B) | 33 | 59 |
| 113 | 402.0B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 32 | 42 |
| 114 | 18.5B CNY (≈$2.6B) | 32 | 29 |