Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AIZ · against 170 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #35 of 171 · scores higher than 78% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score27 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including AIZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its return on assets and return on equity, which are stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | AIZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 142 reported | 19.9% | 10.8% | 79% | Context only | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 20 reported | Not reported | 14.9% | — | — | Context only |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 171 reported | 2.9% | 1.3% | 80% | 50% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 169 reported | 18.3% | 12.8% | 76% | 50% | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 177 reported | 13.3% | 0.0% | 59% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.2B BRL (≈$14.3B) | 98 | 61 | |
| 1 | 24.3B AUD (≈$16.0B) | 98 | 45 | |
| 1 | 11.4B USD | 98 | 66 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 98 | 61 | |
| 1 | 14.2B AUD (≈$9.3B) | 98 | 57 | |
| 30 | 335.07T IDR (≈$20.8B) | 85 | 66 | |
| 30 | 13.0B EUR (≈$14.3B) | 85 | 40 | |
| 33 | 64.2B HKD (≈$8.2B) | 84 | 91 | |
| 33 | 16.7B EUR (≈$18.3B) | 84 | 51 | |
| 35 | 14.6B USD | 83 | 64 | |
| 35 | 7.6B USD | 83 | 78 | |
| 35 | 619.9B INR (≈$7.4B) | 83 | 71 | |
| 35 | 96.4B DKK (≈$14.5B) | 83 | 48 | |
| 39 | 27.9B USD | 82 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score