Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.
How Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. stacks up
AIT · against 305 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
31/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #255 of 306 · scores higher than 15% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score49 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including AIT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 31?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 62% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.4% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 0.0% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.1% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AIT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AIT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 293 reported | 3.6% | 4.0% | 41% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 306 reported | 5.3% | 7.3% | 27% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 154 reported | 4.1% | 3.9% | 55% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 291 reported | 16.1% | 32.3% | 20% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AIT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 9.3B SGD (≈$7.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 3 | 49.8B HKD (≈$6.4B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82.6B NOK (≈$7.8B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 5 | 157.6B HKD (≈$20.2B) | 97 | 67 | |
| 251 | 12.6B NZD (≈$7.6B) | 32 | 37 | |
| 251 | 22.4B USD | 32 | 38 | |
| 255 | 29.9B MYR (≈$6.6B) | 31 | 45 | |
| 255 | 5.7B USD | 31 | 65 | |
| 255 | 11.2B USD | 31 | 55 | |
| 255 | 19.5B USD | 31 | 30 | |
| 255 | 18.4B USD | 31 | 46 | |
| 255 | 148.2B SEK (≈$14.8B) | 31 | 41 | |
| 255 | 9.1B AUD (≈$6.0B) | 31 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score