Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Bitzero Holdings Inc.
How Bitzero Holdings Inc. stacks up
AIBZ · against 199 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
10/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #145 of 200 · scores higher than 16% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score32 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including AIBZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 10?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -27.4% vs peer median 2.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -11.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -32.0% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AIBZ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AIBZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 191 reported | -27.4% | 1.4% | 9% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 210 reported | -11.3% | 4.1% | 13% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 92 reported | -32.0% | 1.6% | 4% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 194 reported | 4.4% | 49.0% | 6% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AIBZ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2.4B HKD (≈$301M) | 98 | 42 | |
| 4 | 35.6B JPY (≈$242M) | 98 | 92 | |
| 145 | 4.6B TWD (≈$141M) | 10 | 30 | |
| 145 | 1.2B MYR (≈$260M) | 10 | 26 | |
| 145 | 10.1B TWD (≈$312M) | 10 | 13 | |
| 145 | 8.1B TWD (≈$251M) | 10 | 34 | |
| 145 | 170M USD | 10 | 5 | |
| 145 | 261M USD | 10 | 30 | |
| 145 | 200M USD | 10 | 32 | |
| 145 | 210M USD | 10 | 30 | |
| 145 | 146M USD | 10 | 9 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score