Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Bitzero Holdings Inc.
How Bitzero Holdings Inc. stacks up
AIBZ · against 212 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
5/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #182 of 213 · scores higher than 13% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score51 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including AIBZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 5?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on assets: -43.3% vs peer median 2.9%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 98% of peers. Return on invested capital: -84.3% vs peer median 6.8%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AIBZ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AIBZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 192 reported | -84.3% | 1.3% | 5% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 210 reported | Not reported | 1.6% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 208 reported | -43.3% | 0.7% | 4% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 199 reported | -347.4% | 3.3% | 3% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 213 reported | 2.3% | 29.1% | 8% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AIBZ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.1B MYR (≈$240M) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 259M USD | 97 | 82 | |
| 3 | 12.9B JPY (≈$88M) | 96 | 75 | |
| 4 | 40.7B JPY (≈$277M) | 95 | 83 | |
| 4 | 136M EUR (≈$149M) | 95 | 73 | |
| 182 | 2.3B CNY (≈$318M) | 5 | 8 | |
| 182 | 4.6B TWD (≈$141M) | 5 | 30 | |
| 182 | 1.9B CNY (≈$262M) | 5 | 26 | |
| 182 | 170M AUD (≈$112M) | 5 | 32 | |
| 182 | 170M USD | 5 | 5 | |
| 187 | 9.3B TWD (≈$288M) | 4 | 18 | |
| 187 | 118M USD | 4 | 5 | |
| 187 | 176M GBP (≈$228M) | 4 | 19 | |
| 190 | 1.9B CNY (≈$263M) | 3 | 16 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score