Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AGMB · against 395 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #66 of 396 · scores higher than 84% of peers · safety percentile 88
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)50 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including AGMB · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AGMB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 363 reported | 0.00× | 0.19× | 93% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 381 reported | Not reported | 0.46 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 389 reported | 12.88× | 2.99× | 87% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 421M USD | 99 | 52 | |
| 3 | 261M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 4 | 397M USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 5 | 455M USD | 99 | 53 | |
| 62 | 334M USD | 89 | 36 | |
| 63 | 650M USD | 88 | 48 | |
| 64 | 276M USD | 88 | 46 | |
| 65 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 88 | 84 | |
| 66 | 337M USD | 88 | 33 | |
| 67 | 13.0B TWD (≈$402M) | 88 | 49 | |
| 68 | 314M USD | 88 | 56 | |
| 69 | 301M USD | 87 | ||
| 70 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 87 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score