Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Agenus Inc.
How Agenus Inc. stacks up
AGEN · against 352 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
92/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #35 of 353 · scores higher than 89% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score44 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including AGEN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 92?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -32.7% vs peer median 0.0%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 87% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.9% vs peer median 4.0%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 99% of peers. Earnings yield: 37.9% vs peer median 1.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AGEN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AGEN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 337 reported | 37.9% | -0.4% | 99% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 358 reported | 12.9% | 1.8% | 85% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 182 reported | -32.7% | -9.2% | 17% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 345 reported | -70.0% | 51.4% | 2% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AGEN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 1.4B HKD (≈$181M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 3.1B HKD (≈$396M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 29.0B JPY (≈$197M) | 99 | 56 | |
| 30 | 37.6B JPY (≈$256M) | 93 | 58 | |
| 30 | 261M USD | 93 | 97 | |
| 35 | 1.6B HKD (≈$209M) | 92 | 54 | |
| 35 | 1.1B MYR (≈$245M) | 92 | 70 | |
| 35 | 301M USD | 92 | 67 | |
| 35 | 251M EUR (≈$276M) | 92 | 52 | |
| 35 | 2.91T IDR (≈$180M) | 92 | 50 | |
| 35 | 298M CHF (≈$342M) | 92 | 74 | |
| 41 | 585.5B KRW (≈$422M) | 91 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score