Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AFRM · against 42 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #7 of 43 · scores higher than 86% of peers · safety percentile 77
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)5 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including AFRM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AFRM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 40 reported | 1.83× | 0.44× | 18% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 43 reported | 3.82 | 1.09 | 0% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 36 reported | 11.98× | 1.91× | 91% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.01T INR (≈$12.2B) | 94 | 84 | |
| 2 | 1.42T INR (≈$17.0B) | 94 | 69 | |
| 3 | 1.05T INR (≈$12.6B) | 91 | ||
| 4 | 1.15T INR (≈$13.8B) | 82 | 60 | |
| 5 | 26.0B GBP (≈$33.9B) | 79 | 73 | |
| 6 | 1.49T INR (≈$17.9B) | 78 | 71 | |
| 7 | 24.3B USD | 77 | 67 | |
| 8 | 12.7B USD | 76 | 63 | |
| 9 | 1.05T INR (≈$12.6B) | 74 | 65 | |
| 10 | 391.0B SEK (≈$39.1B) | 68 | 57 | |
| 11 | 21.7B SGD (≈$16.5B) | 68 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score