Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score
6 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including AFL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 93?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▲faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 92% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 112.8% vs peer median 16.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AFL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
AFL
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Revenue growthHigher is better · 86 reported
13.6%
6.3%
79%
Context only
Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 82 reported
112.8%
12.3%
95%
100%
3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 83 reported
-1.0%
8.5%
2%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
